<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Billy Squier&#8217;s WoodyTone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.woodytone.com/2008/11/05/billy-squiers-woodytone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.woodytone.com/2008/11/05/billy-squiers-woodytone/</link>
	<description>WoodyTone = ToneWoody</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 21:37:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy James</title>
		<link>http://www.woodytone.com/2008/11/05/billy-squiers-woodytone/comment-page-1/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodytone.com/?p=104#comment-369</guid>
		<description>I was fortunate enough to see Billy Squire open for Pat Benetar at the Pier in NYC back in 1982. Squier&#039;s set was awesome, and his vintage tone was very much in evidence: very few (if any) effects, just a LP Standard into a Marshall stack.  
 
Then Benetar hit the stage with Neil Geraldo on guitar. In stark contrast to Squire, Geraldo&#039;s rig was very complex, running through a truck-load of rack-mounted effects. Geraldo got some cool tonal effects with his rig, but the overall sound was slick, over-produced, and unnatural (definitely not &quot;woody&quot;).   
 
The contrast between Squire&#039;s tone and Geraldo&#039;s tone was like night-and-day. Needless to say, I left that concert with a new appreciation of the beautiful simplicity of a great guitar running directly into great amp. It was a huge lesson for a young guitar player on the perils of &quot;too much&quot; signal processing as opposed to the stripped-down approach of Squire.      </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was fortunate enough to see Billy Squire open for Pat Benetar at the Pier in NYC back in 1982. Squier&#039;s set was awesome, and his vintage tone was very much in evidence: very few (if any) effects, just a LP Standard into a Marshall stack.  </p>
<p>Then Benetar hit the stage with Neil Geraldo on guitar. In stark contrast to Squire, Geraldo&#039;s rig was very complex, running through a truck-load of rack-mounted effects. Geraldo got some cool tonal effects with his rig, but the overall sound was slick, over-produced, and unnatural (definitely not &quot;woody&quot;).   </p>
<p>The contrast between Squire&#039;s tone and Geraldo&#039;s tone was like night-and-day. Needless to say, I left that concert with a new appreciation of the beautiful simplicity of a great guitar running directly into great amp. It was a huge lesson for a young guitar player on the perils of &quot;too much&quot; signal processing as opposed to the stripped-down approach of Squire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.woodytone.com @ 2012-05-18 07:41:36 -->
